Hidden Truth of the TAJ MAHAL

I received this email today.. and it made me wonder. Well giving the
benefit of doubt.. it could be true.
Got a bit curious, google Prof PN oak. He does exist on Wikipedia,
self proclaim Professor.

Read more on wiki – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purushottam_Nagesh_Oak

Also found the article on BBC – http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A5220

so he does exist.. would be interesting to get his book.

For your amusement..

Folks it does not matter whether its an hindu temple or a tomb, its a
beautiful structure.

We should cherish it.. not divide it..

Original Email :-

BBC says about Taj Mahal—Hidden Truth – Never say it is a Tomb
No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes the
whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story, Oak says
the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz’s tomb but an ancient Hindu temple
palace of Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya ) . In the course
of his research Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was
usurped by Shah Jahan from
then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court chronicle, Badshahnama,
Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful grand mansion in Agra
was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz’s burial. The ex-Maharaja of Jaipur
still retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for
surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as a
burial place for
dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice among Muslim rulers.

For example, Humayun, Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all buried
in such mansions. Oak’s inquiries began with the name of Taj Mahal. He says

the term ” Mahal ” has never been used for a building in any Muslim country
from Afghanisthan to Algeria . “The unusual explanation that the term Taj
Mahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was illogical in at least two respects.

Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani,” he writes.
Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters ‘Mum’ from a woman’s
name to derive the remainder as the name for the building.”Taj Mahal, he
claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord Shiva’s Palace . Oak
also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale created
by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy archaeologists .
Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan’s time corroborates the
love story.

Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal predates
Shah Jahan’s era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva, worshipped by
Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller of New York took a
few samples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating tests revealed
that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan. European traveler Johan
Albert Mandelslo, who visited Agra in 1638 (only seven years after Mumtaz’s
death), describes the life of the city in his memoirs. But he makes no
reference to the Taj Mahal being built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an
English visitor to Agra within a year of Mumtaz’s death, also suggest the
Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan’s time.

Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural inconsistencies
that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a typical Hindu temple
rather than a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj Mahal have remained sealed
since Shah Jahan’s time and are still inaccessible to the public. Oak
asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other objects
commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples . Fearing political
backlash, Indira Gandhi’s government tried to have Prof. Oak’s book
withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian publisher of the
first edition dire consequences. There is only one way to discredit or
validate Oak’s research..

The current government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj Mahal under
U.N. supervision, and let international experts investigate.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s